|
Malcolm Turnbull needs to bring Noel Pearson to Canberra as a conservative to not only revive the quality and substance of the Coalition, but to improve the fabric of the whole National Parliament.
A
lot has been written about
Malcolm Turnbull’s failure of
judgement in relation to the
fake email apparently concocted
by Liberal stooges within the
Federal Treasury. Turnbull needs
the opprobrium. The impression
of the general public is that
Turnbull was involved up to his
eyebrows in dishonesty. The
minimal tarnish against Turnbull
is that he was, as the
government have suggested,
narrowly opportunistic in the
pursuit of political advantage.
However it is way too soon to
write Turnbull off. The majority
of the national media have used
the current opinion polls to
argue that Turnbull is on the
way out as Federal Leader of the
Liberal National Party.
To
my mind Turnbull needed the kick
in the pants. Turnbull’s
colleagues probably already
realise, as all who have worked
in some fashion with him, that
the man performs best when he is
an underdog and when his back is
against the wall. He is
certainly in that position now.
Turnbull makes mistakes when he
gets too confident and cocky and
his ego takes over from his
intelligence. Turnbull’s
extra-ordinary own goal will do
him the world of good. The
atmosphere of Peter Costello
leaving parliament and leaving
Turnbull as the undisputed
leader of the Federal Liberal
Party was very unhealthy. The
bad Malcom was quick to appear.
Anthony Albanese suggested
Turnbull was the Liberal
National Party’s Mark Latham.
But Turnbull is much better than
that, and Albanese knows it.
Most Labor frontbenchers,
including Albanese, cannot
believe their luck.
Latham folded under pressure,
Turnbull is the opposite. What
Turnbull needs at all times is
pressure from his colleagues and
from the Opposition and then you
will see the best of him. Joe
Hockey’s move to cast himself as
a potential alternative to
Turnbull is a good thing. But
does anybody really think that
Hockey would make as good a
potential leader as Turnbull? Turnbull has only one chance. He now needs to really show Australians that he is an innovator and reformer of Australian government. He needs to put aside the political point scoring and get on with the creation of an alternative big picture. This is where the great opportunities for the Opposition await. It is delicate balance between arguing for reform and re-assuring Australians that the wage earners welfare state which is embedded in the national psyche must be bettered. The message is that if Australians continue to rely on the wage earners welfare model it will have catastrophic consequences in coming decades.
Labor has failed dismally in
delivering change and in taking
on the
Turnbull needs to start to play
on the national policy front. He
also needs some new blood in
I
have not talked to Turnbull or
Pearson about any of these
matters but blind freddy can see
that in the current
circumstances, Pearson would be
a god-send to Turnbull and
Turnbull would get Pearson out
of his current political rut in
far It is presumptuous of me to assume that Pearson would join the Liberal National Party. The person who probably gave Pearson his greatest chance in life - to attend university - was Gough Whitlam and the leader whom he admires most is Paul Keating. But of course these things would make Pearson a persuasive representative for the Liberal National Party and he would bring new credibility for the Liberal National Party amongst the election winning swinging voters of middle Australia.
What
would make Pearson veer towards
the conservatives? It is not
just that Pearson distrusts
Queensland Premier Anna Bligh
and Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
and that there is no-one of
Keating’s leadership quality in
Over
recent years Pearson has become
close to the views advocated by
the conservative Centre for
Independent Studies to the point
where it is hard to distinguish
between the CIS and Pearson on
several matters including
advocacy of the profoundly
flawed
I
disagree with Pearson and the
CIS on many of these matters but
I admire Pearson’s intelligence,
skill and determination and
everyone recognises that Pearson
would bring extraordinary
oratory power, high minded
thinking and knowledge to the
increasingly forgettable and
stale national parliament.
Pearson has an admiration for
Turnbull because he views him as
someone who is determined to get
things done in real practical
terms on the ground and not just
in the rhetorical realm of the
parliament. If Turnbull could
engineer a safe conservative
seat for Pearson and bring him
to |
Peter Botsman is a former
Director of the Whitlam Institute and the Brisbane
Institute.